Which hike has the higher HikeMetrics Intensity Score?

Half Dome has the higher HikeMetrics Intensity Score (74/100 vs 47/100).

Head-to-head match-up

Angels Landing vs Half DomeWhich Hike is Harder?

47/100

Route A

Angels Landing

usa

74/100

Route B

Half Dome

usa

Quick Verdict

Which hike is harder?

The planning question most people actually need: is either route too hard—or too remote—for your skills and rescue margin right now?

Half Dome is significantly harder overall (74 vs 47 on our intensity index) because it carries more sustained physical load and vertical demand. However, Angels Landing may still feel more demanding if you struggle with repeated steep days, slick footing, or carrying fatigue across consecutive stages.

Mission Context

Harder: Half Dome
More technical terrain (modeled footing & obstacles): Half Dome
More weather-sensitive across the full route commitment in this pairing: Half Dome
More remote / harder to exit quickly: Half Dome
Better lower-consequence progression route before the other: Angels Landing

Compare with another route

Key difference

Half Dome loads more into sustained physical load and repeated climbing. Angels Landing shifts more emphasis toward steadier pacing, less technical daily movement, and lower-consequence logistics within this pairing. On our composite index, Half Dome still reads as the heavier overall commitment in this pairing.

Planning snapshot

Elevation context, daily rhythm, and footing—how the two profiles diverge in practice.

Category	Angels Landing	Half Dome
Elevation context & weather feel	~1765 m — serious mountain-weather exposure: mist, cold, and hypothermia can escalate quickly when you move from sheltered forest into alpine ridge wind—wind chill and sudden cloud matter more than the height number alone.	~2690 m — serious mountain-weather exposure: mist, cold, and hypothermia can escalate quickly when you move from sheltered forest into alpine ridge wind—wind chill and sudden cloud matter more than the height number alone.
Daily rhythm & commitment	Shorter format — logistics are usually simpler than a week-long hut corridor.	Shorter format — logistics are usually simpler than a week-long hut corridor.
Navigation read	Signed loop with simple line choice in clear weather; brief confusion risk at junctions and pinch-points when crowded or in poor visibility.	See dossier navigation notes.
Typical footing	A root-snagging, ankle-twisting obstacle course: wait-a-bit (Scutia) thorns, moss-slick stream boulders, and wet Eastern Cape shale-clay “skate” where clay films on shale slip differently than limestone polish. Hours in a closed-canopy humidity greenhouse give way to exposed, misty ridgelines—friction and snags destroy pace before the grade does.	Rough tread dominates—technical ~75/100 in our model reflects that underfoot grind.

Decision physics — deeper read

Pace and vertical geometry—use after the headline verdict when you want the numbers translated into trail feel.

Implied pace from dossier walking-hour bands: ~2.2 km/h on Half Dome versus ~1.9 km/h on Angels Landing. That ≈11% slower implied pace is the clearest signal that Angels Landing—shorter on the map—can still be the heavier trip in practice.

Hiker-Route Fit

All four experience tiers—nothing omitted. Scan where your profile lands; “Poor fit” is intentional when the gap is large.

Beginner

Angels

Stretch / prep

Half

Poor fit

Intermediate

Angels

Good fit

Half

Stretch / prep

Advanced

Angels

Good fit

Half

Good fit

Expert

Angels

Good fit

Half

Good fit

Ground Truth	Angels Landing	Half Dome
Hazard & consequences	extreme fall hazard: The final half-mile is highly exposed with serious drop-offs on both sides. lightning: The peak is a lightning magnet during summer afternoon storms, and its exposed sandstone remains dangerous even after the main front passes. crowd crush: The trail gets dangerously crowded, forcing people to pass each other on the narrowest sections of the chain.	lightning strikes: Half Dome is a giant lightning rod. Several people have been killed by lightning while on the summit or the cables. serious falls on cables: The granite is slick. If you fall outside the cables, there is nothing to stop you.
Navigation & route	Route-finding is usually simple on the signed loop—side paths and rim options can still cause brief confusion in poor visibility; keep map or GPS handy.	Carry map/GPS discipline—mist, forest, or uneven marking can slow confidence even on an official trail.
Weather exposure	Wind and rain change grip on limestone faster than the headline forecast suggests—carry a shell and treat polished steps as slick after wet spells.	Mountain or forest weather: mist, cold snaps, and rain that turns footing slick—budget slower days after wet spells.
Access & resupply	Resupply & water: At The Grotto trailhead	Resupply & water: None past the trailhead bridge
Comms & reach	Coverage: Partial — Cell coverage is decent on the ridge but dead in the canyon below. Rescues are common and highly complex, often involving National Park Service rope teams.	Coverage: Partial — Cell coverage is decent on the summit and Sub Dome, but drops out in Little Yosemite Valley. SAR (Search and Rescue) teams are highly active here.

A day on the trail

One vibe line plus three bullets per route—enough to sanity-check pacing without re-reading the full dossier.

Angels Landing

Feels like a serious UK day walk: short miles, but polished limestone, rim exposure, and crowding can stack stress—without week-long trek stakes.

Expect short, steep bursts, polished limestone, and extra friction from crowding near gorge rims and busy access points.
Expect significant pace-lag from bottlenecking at stiles, pinch-points, and polished rock on weekends and peak holidays—social friction is part of the difficulty.
Friction dominates pace: boulders, moraines, or river work can make short map distances feel like very long days.

Half Dome

Feels like the Cables. The 'X-Factor' is the raw physical and psychological exertion of the final cable ascent—with weather and pacing rewriting the script daily.

Modeled average: about 22–31 km per indexed calendar day (your stages can land above or below that band).
Walking-time hint from the dossier: 10–14 where hours are specified alongside days.
If you sit in that walking-hour band, implied pace is about 2.2 km per walking hour on an average day—compare routes on this, not on “eight hours is eight hours.”

Terrain Differences

Angels Landing: Overview: Angels Landing is a prominent sandstone navigation point within Zion National Park, Utah. Geological Context: Rising 453 meters (1,488 feet) above the Virgin River, the formation consists of massive Navajo Sandstone layers shaped by long-term fluvial erosion. The Ridge Scramble. A defining feature of this route is the narrow sandstone bridge equipped with fixed iron chains for stability.

Half Dome: Half Dome is the significant icon of Yosemite National Park and arguably the most famous and coveted day hike in North America. Looming almost 5,000 feet (1,500m) above Yosemite Valley, the massive granite dome challenges hikers with a grueling, massive elevation gain. The Cables. The 'X-Factor' is the raw physical and psychological exertion of the final cable ascent. The granite is polished smooth by millions of boots.

Final verdict

Final verdict: for most hikers comparing these two treks, Half Dome is the tougher overall commitment in this pair; Angels Landing is the more approachable option.

Choose Half Dome if you prefer technical, leg-burning terrain; choose Angels Landing for a different balance of distance and recovery.

Plan & prepare your hike

Next step: explore the full route guide

Once you have chosen your route, open the full guide to review key logistics, gear, and preparation tips—then use the Plan This Hike section to organize your trip.

Each guide includes route context, practical preparation advice, and curated resources to help you plan your hike.

Open guide · Angels Landing Open guide · Half Dome

Who should choose which route?

Choose Angels Landing if you:

You prefer the lighter logistical load while still getting a credible experience.
You want a clearer time box with fewer consecutive hard days.
You are building endurance before tackling bigger expedition-style routes.

Choose Half Dome if you:

You want the route our index ranks heavier in this head-to-head—then validate against the metrics table, not the headline number alone.
Our dossier tags audience around “Advanced”—validate against your own experience.

Do not choose if…

Hard filters derived from remoteness, hazard tier, risks, and dossier audience tags—not polite suggestions.

Angels Landing

The dossier does not add bespoke “hard stop” rules beyond treating this as hazard tier 4/5—still match weather, footing, and fatigue to your real experience.

Half Dome

Do not choose Half Dome if multi-day remote terrain, self-rescue judgment, and rough footing under load are all new to you.
Do not choose if you cannot accept that mistakes here may carry severe or fatal consequences.

Keep browsing

Compare these hikes with others

Angels Landing

Half Dome

Explore by difficulty

Jump to intensity buckets to find easier or harder routes than this pair on our index.

Metrics engine

Head-to-head performance variables computation.

Intensity Score

Route B — Higher Demand

Physical Load

Route B — More Taxing

Technical

Route B — More Technical

Distance

Route B — Longer

8.7 km

26 km

Elevation Gain

Route B — More vertical

453 m

1,460 m

Vertical density

Route B — More climb per km

~52 m/km

~56 m/km

Implied walking pace

Route A — Slower modeled pace

~1.9 km/h

~2.2 km/h

Highest Point

Route B — Higher summit

1,765 m

2,690 m

Duration

Route B — Longer commitment

4–5 h

10–14 h

Hazard Level

Route B — Higher hazard level

SERIOUS // HIGH CONSEQUENCE (4/5)

LETHAL // NO-MARGIN (5/5)

Reading the metrics

Technical score reflects terrain complexity in the model (footing, obstacles, sustained steepness), not perceived exposure or tourist-style edge risk.
Implied walking pace divides indexed horizontal distance per day by the midpoint of each dossier’s walking-hour band when both exist—a workload sanity check, not a stopwatch guarantee.
On short multi-day trips, some dossiers encode cumulative route hours (not per-day averages). When that pattern is detected, we show route-wide pace instead of a misleading per-day figure.
Vertical density is total modeled gain divided by horizontal route distance.

Technical score bands (0–100)

0–20 — Defined tread, few modeled obstacles—mostly hiking pace variance.
21–40 — Rougher path: loose stone, roots, mud, or slower footing.
41–60 — Steep or uneven moves; hands-on moves possible in places.
61–80 — Strong route-finding signals and/or sustained exposure in the dossier mix.
81–100 — High-consequence expedition or Arctic/wilderness terrain seriousness in the model.

Hazard level — what the labels mean

LOW // ACCESS (1/5)Bumps and bruises territory; help is usually close if you carry a phone.Low access friction for prepared walkers; slips still hurt, but margins are wide.
STANDARD // TRAIL (2/5)Injury possible; rescue is typically reachable in reasonable time when you call early.Standard trail stakes: weather, footing, and fatigue drive most incidents.
MODERATE // CHALLENGING (3/5)Serious harm is plausible—self-rescue skill and solid judgment matter as much as fitness.A bad decision or a fall can turn serious; self-rescue and navigation skills matter.
SERIOUS // HIGH CONSEQUENCE (4/5)Outcomes can be severe; professional rescue may be slow, limited, or weather-gated.Serious, high-consequence terrain; injuries can be severe and help may be slow.
LETHAL // NO-MARGIN (5/5)Mistakes can be fatal; rescue is uncertain, delayed, or impossible until conditions allow.Mistakes can be fatal; rescue is not guaranteed and is often weather- or logistics-gated.