HikeMetrics
Global Hiking Index
HikeMetrics
Global Hiking Index
HikeMetrics // Comparison Engine
Route A

Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail)

jordan/dana-biosphere-petra
VS
Route B

Mount Fitz Roy (Cerro Fitz Roy)

argentina/patagonia

Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail) vs Mount Fitz Roy (Cerro Fitz Roy): Intensity Score Comparison

Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail) is unequivocally more demanding overall (+16 points). While Mount Fitz Roy (Cerro Fitz Roy) is a serious endeavor, Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail) pushes the limits further, particularly regarding sustained physical exertion.

Model-based (not a field report) · Evaluates overall route demand, not danger.

Intensity Difference
+16 Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail) is harder
Higher Physical Load
Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail)
Higher Technical Seriousness
Mount Fitz Roy (Cerro Fitz Roy)
Greater Commitment
Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail)
Overall HikeMetrics Score
Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail)wins 7 of 9 metrics
7
Route A
2
Route B
jordan/dana-biosphere-petra

Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail)

EXPERT // HAZARD
Full Route Report

The Dana to Petra section of the Jordan Trail is a multi-day desert traverse connecting the Dana Biosphere Reserve to the archaeological site of Petra. The route transits through the Great Rift Valley, descending from the Dana ridge at 1,200 meters through the Wadi Dana gorge into the arid plains of Wadi Araba. The trek culminates in the 'Back Door' entry to Petra, a high-altitude Nabataean mountain path that provides immediate access to the Monastery (Ad Deir). The route is defined by its geological transition from limestone escarpments to sandstone canyons and the presence of Bronze Age copper mines in the Feynan region.

argentina/patagonia

Mount Fitz Roy (Cerro Fitz Roy)

EXPERT // HAZARD
Full Route Report

The trek to Laguna de los Tres is one of the primary day activities in Los Glaciares National Park, providing a close-perspective view of the granite massif of Mount Fitz Roy (3,405m). The route follows an out-and-back trail through mixed forest and glaciated valleys, passing the Piedras Blancas viewpoint before the final ascent. The journey is defined by a significant transition from the low-lying valley floor to the high-alpine environment of the lagoon, which sits directly below the main peaks.

Head-to-Head Metric Analysis

Intensity ScoreHigher Overall Demand
61 WINNER
45
Physical LoadMore Physically Taxing
70 WINNER
46
Technical SeriousnessMore Technically Demanding
32
WINNER36
DistanceLonger route
76 km WINNER
21 km
Elevation GainMore vertical
2,679 m WINNER
850 m
Highest PointHigher summit
1,200 m WINNER
1,170 m
DurationShorter commitment
5 days
WINNER1 days
Hazard Level
EXPERT // HAZARD
EXPERT // HAZARD
Crowd LevelLess crowded
2 / 5 WINNER
5 / 5
RemotenessMore remote
5 / 5 WINNER
3 / 5

HikeMetrics Hazard Scale — Explanation

1
LOW // ACCESS
2
STANDARD // RT
3
MODERATE // CHLG
4
EXPERT // HAZARD
5
EXTREME // LETHAL

The HikeMetrics Hazard Scale is a proprietary 5-point classification system that evaluates hiking routes across five dimensions: physical demand, technical complexity, altitude exposure, weather risk, and rescue accessibility.

Unlike generic star ratings, the Hazard Scale is calibrated against altitude profiles, elevation gain per day, and logistical isolation factors — making it the most precise route classification system available.

Full Scale Documentation
Route A // Hazard Verdict
Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail)
EXPERT // HAZARD
heat and sun exposure: The transit across the Wadi Araba floor involves sustained exposure to temperatures exceeding 40°C in unshaded desert conditions.
flash flood risk: Narrow canyon systems (Wadis) in the Rift Valley are subject to rapid flash flooding from localized rainfall in the eastern highlands.
Route B // Hazard Verdict
Mount Fitz Roy (Cerro Fitz Roy)
EXPERT // HAZARD
high wind exposure: Strong winds are common in the Fitz Roy massif, particularly in the afternoon. Gusts can make the final ascent unstable in exposed conditions.
lower limb strain: The final descent is steep and rocky, which can strain knees and ankles on the return journey.

Required Gear Comparison

Dana to Petra (Jordan Trail)
High-performance desert-specific breathable shellTechnical trekking boots with aggressive rock-clamping solesDesert-specific headwear (Shemagh) for moisture retention and UV protectionUV-rated eye protection (Category 3 or 4 recommended)Minimum 20,000mAh power capacity for 5-day offline GPS tracking
Mount Fitz Roy (Cerro Fitz Roy)
Trekking poles for stability and knee supportDurable hiking boots with high-traction solesModular layering system (temperatures at the lagoon are significantly lower than in town)Technical windbreaker or hardshell layerReliable headlamp for pre-dawn startsHydration capacity of 2L (purification recommended for stream water)

Compare with Other Routes

argentina
Cerro Tronador (Refugio Otto Meiling)
MODERATE // CHLG
argentina
Huemul Circuit
EXTREME // LETHAL
argentina
Perito Moreno Glacier Trail
EXPERT // HAZARD
austria
Graukogel — Pine Forests & strenuous Ridges
EXPERT // HAZARD
austria
Seefelder Spitze — The Karwendel Crown
EXPERT // HAZARD
australia
Overland Track
EXPERT // HAZARD