HikeMetrics
Global Hiking Index
HikeMetrics
Global Hiking Index
HikeMetrics // Comparison Engine
Route A

Angels Landing

usa/Utah (Zion National Park)
VS
Route B

Three Capes Track

australia/tasman-peninsula-tasmania

Angels Landing vs Three Capes Track: Intensity Score Comparison

Both routes share a similar overall intensity (45 vs 46). Depending on personal strengths, the challenge relies more on Angels Landing's technicality versus the physical output of the other.

Model-based (not a field report) · Evaluates overall route demand, not danger.

Intensity Difference
+1 Three Capes Track is harder
Higher Physical Load
Three Capes Track
Higher Technical Seriousness
Angels Landing
Greater Commitment
Three Capes Track
Overall HikeMetrics Score
Three Capes Trackwins 7 of 10 metrics
3
Route A
7
Route B
usa/Utah (Zion National Park)

Angels Landing

EXPERT // HAZARD
Full Route Report

Overview: Angels Landing is a prominent sandstone navigation point within Zion National Park, Utah. Geological Context: Rising 453 meters (1,488 feet) above the Virgin River, the formation consists of massive Navajo Sandstone layers shaped by long-term fluvial erosion. The trail incorporates the historic Walter's Wiggles switchbacks and segments of the West Rim Trail. Booking & Logistics Reality: Since 2022, a mandated permit lottery system (seasonal and day-before) is required to access the chain section beyond Scout Lookout. The final 0.8 kilometers (0.5 miles) involves a narrow ridge with steep drop-offs of approximately 300 meters (1,000 feet).

australia/tasman-peninsula-tasmania

Three Capes Track

STANDARD // RT
Full Route Report

The Three Capes Track is a 48km point-to-point trekking route within Tasman National Park, Tasmania. Starting at the Port Arthur Historic Site with a marine transfer across the bay to Denmans Cove, the route traverses the high sea cliffs of the Tasman Peninsula. The track is highly engineered, featuring wide gravel paths and boardwalks that provide safe access to vertical dolerite columns reaching 300 meters above the Southern Ocean. Management is handled by the Tasmania Parks & Wildlife Service, with a regulated north-to-south flow. The route transitions through diverse environments including coastal heathland, dry sclerophyll forest, and temperate rainforest.

Head-to-Head Metric Analysis

Intensity ScoreHigher Overall Demand
45
WINNER46
Physical LoadMore Physically Taxing
27
WINNER63
Technical SeriousnessMore Technically Demanding
52 WINNER
14
DistanceLonger route
8.7 km
WINNER48 km
Elevation GainMore vertical
453 m
WINNER1,400 m
Highest PointHigher summit
1,765 m WINNER
457 m
DurationShorter commitment
1 days WINNER
4 days
Hazard LevelMore accessible
EXPERT // HAZARD
WINNERSTANDARD // RT
Crowd LevelLess crowded
5 / 5
WINNER3 / 5
RemotenessMore remote
1 / 5
WINNER3 / 5

HikeMetrics Hazard Scale — Explanation

1
LOW // ACCESS
2
STANDARD // RT
3
MODERATE // CHLG
4
EXPERT // HAZARD
5
EXTREME // LETHAL

The HikeMetrics Hazard Scale is a proprietary 5-point classification system that evaluates hiking routes across five dimensions: physical demand, technical complexity, altitude exposure, weather risk, and rescue accessibility.

Unlike generic star ratings, the Hazard Scale is calibrated against altitude profiles, elevation gain per day, and logistical isolation factors — making it the most precise route classification system available.

Full Scale Documentation
Route A // Hazard Verdict
Angels Landing
EXPERT // HAZARD
extreme fall hazard: The final half-mile is highly exposed with serious drop-offs on both sides.
lightning: The peak is a lightning magnet during summer afternoon storms, and its exposed sandstone remains dangerous even after the main front passes.
Route B // Hazard Verdict
Three Capes Track
STANDARD // RT
maritime wind exposure: The Tasman Peninsula is directly exposed to Southern Ocean frontal systems, which can deliver high-velocity gusts and sudden thermal shifts.
topographical exposure: Portions of the track follow cliff lines reaching 300 meters. While the path is wide, these sections remain unfenced in several areas.

Required Gear Comparison

Angels Landing
Grippy approach shoes/trail runners (sandstone becomes slick under thousands of boots)Gloves (optional but highly recommended for gripping the iron chains)Sunscreen and hat (there is zero shade on the fin)Permit (printed or downloaded on phone)
Three Capes Track
Supportive hiking footwear (optimized for gravel and stone stairs)Technical waterproof and windproof shellSynthetic or wool thermal base layersLightweight sleeping bag (mattresses are provided)Self-sufficient food supply for 4 daysSun protection and insect repellent

Compare with Other Routes

argentina
Mount Fitz Roy (Cerro Fitz Roy)
EXPERT // HAZARD
argentina
Perito Moreno Glacier Trail
EXPERT // HAZARD
austria
Dachstein Krippenstein — The 5 Fingers & Alpine Shark
STANDARD // RT
austria
The Gaisalmsteig — Achensee’s Fjordside Path
STANDARD // RT
austria
Graukogel — Pine Forests & strenuous Ridges
EXPERT // HAZARD
austria
Grossglockner — The Gamsgrubenweg Trail
STANDARD // RT